 |
| Cepaea nemoralis (CC by Papa Lima Whiskey 2) |
The problem of disjunct distribution of Western European species or, in this case, subclades of a single species is nothing new and has been startling biologists for almost two centuries already, with particular interest of Irish-Iberian, Breton-Iberian or just general Irish-continental disjunct relationships of various species (the so called Lusitanian distribution). Among them is the iconic strawberry tree (madroño in Spanish, found in Ireland but not Great Britain) but also a number of small land animals: the Kerry slug (found in NW Iberia and SW Ireland only), the Quimper snail (found in NW Iberia and Western Brittany) or the Pyrenean glass snail (found in the Pyrenees and Ireland).
There are also cases of subclades within an otherwise widespread species which show a similar pattern. In 2003, Masheretti et al. demonstrated that the Irish variant of the pygmy shrew had its greatest affinity with populations of Andorra, in the Eastern Pyrenees, from which they are descended.
This study illustrates a similar case but affecting the snail species Cepaea nemoralis (grove snail or brown lipped snail), whose Irish lineages are mostly derived from Iberian ones and in most cases from the Eastern Pyrenean haplogroup C.
Adele J. Grindon & Angus Davison, Irish Cepaea nemoralis Land Snails Have a Cryptic Franco-Iberian Origin That Is Most Easily Explained by the Movements of Mesolithic Humans. PLoS Genetics 2013. Open access → LINK [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065792]
Abstract
The origins of flora and fauna that are only found in Ireland and Iberia, but which are absent from intervening countries, is one of the enduring questions of biogeography. As Southern French, Iberian and Irish populations of the land snail Cepaea nemoralis sometimes have a similar shell character, we used mitochondrial phylogenies to begin to understand if there is a shared “Lusitanian” history. Although much of Europe contains snails with A and D lineages, by far the majority of Irish individuals have a lineage, C, that in mainland Europe was only found in a restricted region of the Eastern Pyrenees. A past extinction of lineage C in the rest of Europe cannot be ruled out, but as there is a more than 8000 year continuous record of Cepaea fossils in Ireland, the species has long been a food source in the Pyrenees, and the Garonne river that flanks the Pyrenees is an ancient human route to the Atlantic, then we suggest that the unusual distribution of the C lineage is most easily explained by the movements of Mesolithic humans. If other Irish species have a similarly cryptic Lusitanian element, then this raises the possibility of a more widespread and significant pattern.
The evidence gathered by this study is most readily visible in fig. 2:
While it is not the focus of this study, we see here two other cases of probable disjunct distribution:
- Hg D is found in Iberia, Ireland, small pockets in Britain and SW France but also in North and Central Europe.
- Hg F shows also disjunct presence in Cornwall, far away from the main cluster around the Bay of Biscay.
The authors of this and previous studies have suggested that this distribution may have to do with intentional transport (as livestock) in the process of the colonization of the Atlantic Islands in the Epipaleolithic. In support of this claim, there is enough fossil evidence of the snail in the island:
Fossil material indicates that this species has been continuously present in Ireland for at least 8000 years (Newlands Cross, Co. Dublin: 7600+/−500 BP Cartronmacmanus, Co. Mayo: 8207+/−165) [7], [8].
In other cases, such as the inedible Kerry slug, we may suspect unintentional transport and therefore we would be justified to imagine a later time frame for their arrival to Ireland, possibly in the Chalcolithic-Megalithic period, but the evidence for C. nemoralis is highly suggestive of intentional transport in the Epipaleolithic. We can therefore say that the humble grove snail was one of the first domestic animals of Europe, possibly second after the dog.
I don't get it.
ReplyDeleteIs the article proposing that 8000 years ago people were breeding snails as if they were cattle and that there was a "comercial route" from that area around the Pyrenees directly to Irland?
Or was a colonization route? I find it completly rare that they took "strawberries" to Irland but not to Great Britain. They jumped over Great Britain? There was some kind of boikot???
Do you have any idea about what does it mean?
The details are, I guess, debatable, but the proposed conclusion is that hunter-gatherers intentionally moved the snails from A to B, i.e. from the Pyrenees to Ireland, in order to secure for themselves a food source that back in the day was very important (Epipaleolithic in Europe and other places has lots of evidence of widespread mollusk consumption, both marine and terrestrial).
DeleteSomehow these patterns suggest a more direct migration from what is now Southern France or Northern Iberia to, specifically, Ireland. Would it be just one species, maybe it could argue for some sort of randomized effects, like later replacement of one clade by another in Britain or other areas, but the "Lusitanian distribution" pattern seems to be repeated across several species.
I guess it's still possible that the Irish Epipaleolithic snails and the modern ones are not directly related, i.e. that there was a replacement at a later stage, but then how did the new clade have such a widespread success?
It's not 100% conclusive but, as the authors see it (and I tend to agree), the most parsimonious explanation is that Epipaleolithic peoples carried them from SW Europe, either consciously (I'd favor this idea) or unconsciously (as hijackers of vegetable food stocks).
They could well have stopped in the already colonized Britain (they should) but not settled there and moved instead to Ireland.