tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3023805782808412230.post7058505572328118825..comments2024-03-09T15:46:44.638+01:00Comments on For what they were... we are: First ancient mtDNA nice mapsMajuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369840391933337204noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3023805782808412230.post-5530270785222206792012-03-26T22:41:25.543+02:002012-03-26T22:41:25.543+02:00Yes. I think that calibrated C14 ages. The first m...Yes. I think that calibrated C14 ages. The first map refers to Gravettian and Solutrean periods (Early and Middle Upper Paleolithic, as there are no analyzed remains from the Aurignacian period).<br /><br />For details please refer to <a href="http://www.buildinghistory.org/distantpast/ancientdna.shtml" rel="nofollow">Jean Manco's aDNA page</a>, which I generally used and use for reference on aDNA matters (this does not imply agreement with her in other issues but her work on aDNA research online cataloging is outstanding, no doubt). In her site you can find all the references and other details. <br /><br />The interest of these maps is not only that they are visually accessible but that I scrapped the subjective (and sometimes obsolete) reporting of authors and directly compared, very methodically, the reported sequences with PhyloTree (version 11).Majuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369840391933337204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3023805782808412230.post-60435645630715905772012-03-26T20:19:24.294+02:002012-03-26T20:19:24.294+02:00These dates are based on carbon dating?These dates are based on carbon dating?Etyopishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17311733086301215105noreply@blogger.com